Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
26.9 weeks
45.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
1
Rejected
2012
Motivation: The length of time for reviews was very long. I revised the manuscript following the advice of the first reviewers. One had accepted the manuscript with no changes, the other asked for revisions. But then the editors sent the manuscript out to new reviewers who raised other issues. At this point I think it would have been fair to have treated the manuscript as being a first submission and give me the opportunity to revise.