Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.9 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2025
Motivation: The review process was efficient, and it was clear that the reviewers had topic knowledge and provided feedback that was relevant with the intention of improving it.
7.7 weeks
10.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Thorough review process with meaningful input. Length of time required for initial and secondary review seems more than reasonable.