Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
9.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2016
Motivation: They were efficient and sent a lot of feedback but the first reasons listed for reject were focused on failing to conform completely to APA style & then ideological differences - the latter is unacceptable and the former tends to happen when reviewers don't have more substantive comments to make.