Reviews for "Journal of Research in Science Teaching"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a 2 5
Accepted 2019
Motivation: We received a major revision and then the resubmission was accepted by the editor. We heard from 2 reviewers and their comments and suggestions were all spot-on, though some are tough to address. We even got an extension for resubmission from the assisting editors. The process was smooth and rigorous. The requirement of formatting was quite different than other journals in the field though.