Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
31.3 weeks
31.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The editor was professional and very kind. One reviewer was quite nasty in some comments mainly driven by prejudices than by experimental evidence. However, all things considered, I am satisfied about the final outcomes. I guess that reducing the time from the submission to the first review round (8 months) would be appreciated by the authors (this does not happen only because of the covid-19). Overall, if in future I will have the opportunity, I will consider this outlet again for my studies.
37.9 weeks
37.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
Review took 260+ days, no updates were provided during the process. The journal sent the manuscript to one reviewer, who had different theoretical and methodological perspectives than mine, and gave me no opportunity to respond.
Drawn back before first editorial decision after 425.6 days
Drawn back
2014
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
Wonderful process.