Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.0 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The review reports was very useful and professional, as well as the editorial board members. The using of latex format by the journal makes the paper form match to the journal formats.
4.4 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
professional and efficient review process
13.0 weeks
15.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The editor works hard to get reviewers comply with the deadlines. In general, I believe he manages well exchanges between authors and reviewers.