Reviews for "Journal of Public Health"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.3 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: The journal had an relatively fast turnaround time after initial submission. The revised submission was accepted by the editor without being send back out to the reviewers. Overall, this was a good process.
3.6 weeks
3.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2019
7.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
4
Rejected
2015
Motivation: Note that this review is about OUP's Journal of Public Health, not about the Springer journal of the same name. Overall a good experience, fast and concise reviews.
4.6 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2012
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
Motivation: The decision was very fast. They stated the suitability of the article on the journal and suggested where can I publish the manuscript.