Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.9 weeks
16.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2024
Motivation: The editor was an active participant in the review process, essentially functioning as a third reviewer. While this added a lot of work, it led to a final outcome of high quality.
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
21.7 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
2
Rejected
2015
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
4
Rejected
2014
36.9 weeks
71.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2011
Motivation: it was a lengthy process, but the evaluation was fair, informed and useful