Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
30.4 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2015
Motivation:
The process took way too long with as an output a terse and vague reviewers' report, a standard rejection letter, and 7 months of times wasted.
34.7 weeks
52.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Drawn back
2012
Motivation:
the editor and the associate editor seemed to have difficulty communicating, with each other and with me