Reviews for "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Rejected
2013
Motivation: Despite formally a rejection, the handling of case by the editors of JPART was excellent. They were courteous, quick and professional. The three referee reports were all constructive, highly professional, courteous and detailed. The author could hardly have received more valuable advice from elsewhere.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2014
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2012
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2011
Motivation: The review process was handled professionally with high-quality reports given by external reviewers.