Reviews for "Journal of Power Sources"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Journal of Power Sources | 5.4 weeks |
16.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The review was very fast and the comments were reasonable. | |||||||
Journal of Power Sources | n/a | n/a | 1.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: The editor wrote that the manuscriot was not appropiate for the journal readership even if I cited a lot of papers from the journal of the same topic. | |||||||
Journal of Power Sources | 8.7 weeks |
10.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Motivation: My may concer about to this manuscript and this Journal is that I received an extra reviewer report by a new reviewer after resubmit the paper revised according to the comments of the two first reviewers. Thus, the paper was published with a big delay time. More than one year. | |||||||
Journal of Power Sources | 8.7 weeks |
8.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The manuscript was rejected as the reviewers find the results not adequate to a journal that deals with actual power source. The reviewers contend that, given the depth of the Microbiology-related discussion in the manuscript, it was more suitable for a general Biotechnology Journal. I think the reviewers were correct and the Editor decision was the right one. |