Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.7 weeks
4.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2023
Motivation:
JoPS suggested a transfer to another elsevier journal.
5.4 weeks
16.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The review was very fast and the comments were reasonable.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
The editor wrote that the manuscriot was not appropiate for the journal readership even if I cited a lot of papers from the journal of the same topic.
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
My may concer about to this manuscript and this Journal is that I received an extra reviewer report by a new reviewer after resubmit the paper revised according to the comments of the two first reviewers. Thus, the paper was published with a big delay time. More than one year.
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
The manuscript was rejected as the reviewers find the results not adequate to a journal that deals with actual power source. The reviewers contend that, given the depth of the Microbiology-related discussion in the manuscript, it was more suitable for a general Biotechnology Journal. I think the reviewers were correct and the Editor decision was the right one.