Reviews for "Journal of Power Sources"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Power Sources 5.4
weeks
16.4
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review was very fast and the comments were reasonable.
Journal of Power Sources n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The editor wrote that the manuscriot was not appropiate for the journal readership even if I cited a lot of papers from the journal of the same topic.
Journal of Power Sources 8.7
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: My may concer about to this manuscript and this Journal is that I received an extra reviewer report by a new reviewer after resubmit the paper revised according to the comments of the two first reviewers. Thus, the paper was published with a big delay time. More than one year.
Journal of Power Sources 8.7
weeks
8.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: The manuscript was rejected as the reviewers find the results not adequate to a journal that deals with actual power source. The reviewers contend that, given the depth of the Microbiology-related discussion in the manuscript, it was more suitable for a general Biotechnology Journal. I think the reviewers were correct and the Editor decision was the right one.