Reviews for "Journal of Physics, D: Applied Physics"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Journal of Physics, D: Applied Physics | 11.7 weeks |
12.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The initial review process took very long. One of the reviewer has seemingly ignored the paper for several weeks. The paper was eventually accepted. | |||||||
Journal of Physics, D: Applied Physics | 7.0 weeks |
9.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: With the first round taking 7 weeks and producing 3 referee reports (2 of which were excellent), I feel that the quality of our manuscript was increased considerably due to the requested revision. The referees of the two excellent reports then quickly accepted the revised manuscript with a one-liner. Overall, JPD did a great job of handling the entire process. |