Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.7 weeks
12.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Accepted
2017
Motivation: The initial review process took very long. One of the reviewer has seemingly ignored the paper for several weeks. The paper was eventually accepted.
7.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: With the first round taking 7 weeks and producing 3 referee reports (2 of which were excellent), I feel that the quality of our manuscript was increased considerably due to the requested revision. The referees of the two excellent reports then quickly accepted the revised manuscript with a one-liner. Overall, JPD did a great job of handling the entire process.