Reviews for "Journal of Physical Chemistry, C"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C Immediately accepted after 0.3 weeks Accepted (im.)
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 15.7
weeks		 15.7
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 7.7
weeks		 7.7
weeks		 n/a 1 2
(moderate)		 2
(moderate)		 Rejected
Motivation: My paper was transferred to "Journal of Physical Chemistry C" from "ACS Energy Letters" following the advice of the editor of "ACS Energy Letters".
Then after waiting for nearly 2 months, I received just some general reviewer comments (6 lines of text recommending rejection - not original enough was the only argument) and from just 1 reviewer. This reviewer job could have been done in just 2 hours but it took nearly 2 months!
I will never again submit to this journal. It shows no respect for the authors.
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 3.0
weeks		 4.0
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: Everything was clear, rather quick, and properly handled by the editors.
The referee comments were appropriate and helped us.
The overall duration of hte revision process was absolutely acceptable.
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 13.0
weeks		 17.0
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 4.3
weeks		 4.6
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 8.9
weeks		 9.7
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: This experience was revealed that choosing the experienced and efficient high scientific level reviewers is the key to make efficient reviewing process.
Journal of Physical Chemistry, C 2.5
weeks		 2.6
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: After publishing in several other journals, the overall experience in working with JPC-C was eye-opening. Not only were the referee reports in total, as well as their criticism relevant (something that can sadly not be expected from certain other journals), but they also arrived fast. Interaction with the editing staff was flawless and uncomplicated.

I can only recommend JPC-C to everyone.