Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
Immediately accepted after 0.3 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2020
15.7 weeks
15.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2018
7.7 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
2
2
Rejected
2018
Motivation: My paper was transferred to "Journal of Physical Chemistry C" from "ACS Energy Letters" following the advice of the editor of "ACS Energy Letters".
Then after waiting for nearly 2 months, I received just some general reviewer comments (6 lines of text recommending rejection - not original enough was the only argument) and from just 1 reviewer. This reviewer job could have been done in just 2 hours but it took nearly 2 months!
I will never again submit to this journal. It shows no respect for the authors.
3.0 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Everything was clear, rather quick, and properly handled by the editors.
The referee comments were appropriate and helped us.
The overall duration of hte revision process was absolutely acceptable.
13.0 weeks
17.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2015
4.3 weeks
4.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
8.9 weeks
9.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: This experience was revealed that choosing the experienced and efficient high scientific level reviewers is the key to make efficient reviewing process.
2.5 weeks
2.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: After publishing in several other journals, the overall experience in working with JPC-C was eye-opening. Not only were the referee reports in total, as well as their criticism relevant (something that can sadly not be expected from certain other journals), but they also arrived fast. Interaction with the editing staff was flawless and uncomplicated.

I can only recommend JPC-C to everyone.