Reviews for "Journal of Phycology"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
30.4 weeks
33.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2020
20.1 weeks
20.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Drawn back
2016
5.0 weeks
5.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2013
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
3
Accepted
2012
8.7 weeks
15.2 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
3
Accepted
2013
17.4 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2011
Motivation: The reviewers were expert referees. They had many good and constructive comments. Even though the reviewers had certain substantive concerns in the first submission, they clearly saw the potential and were responsive to our significant efforts in revision. The editor was fair and prompt in responses.