Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
he editor hasn't even read the work's abstract thoroughly; the response makes it evident. While there's no criticism regarding the quality of the manuscript, the editor stated that the purportedly 'new' methodology isn't actually novel. But this is false.
34.7 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
8 months after submission, we received two reviews. One was positive, the other had criticisms that were subjective, minor, or readily addressed. The paper was rejected without the opportunity to revise or address the criticisms. We submitted it to another journal with a similar impact factor. It was reviewed there in 3 weeks. We revised to address minor suggestions from the reviewers. It was published 9 weeks after the initial submission to the second journal.