Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.9 weeks
18.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2021
3.1 weeks
3.1 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
Journal was very quick. One review was of good quality, constructive and definitely improved the manuscript. Reviewer 3 was embarrassing and unfair: "It is not clear if this correlation was corrected for multiple comparisons (p=0.16/3 = 0.048)" on a correlation reported in MS of (r = -0.63; p < 0.016) and reviewer 4 was embarrassing. Both not appear to be experts on the topic. Reviewers bad choice and superficial assessment of associate editor.
6.1 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2016