Reviews for "Journal of Pain"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Pain 3.1
weeks
3.1
weeks
n/a 4 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Journal was very quick. One review was of good quality, constructive and definitely improved the manuscript. Reviewer 3 was embarrassing and unfair: "It is not clear if this correlation was corrected for multiple comparisons (p=0.16/3 = 0.048)" on a correlation reported in MS of (r = -0.63; p < 0.016) and reviewer 4 was embarrassing. Both not appear to be experts on the topic. Reviewers bad choice and superficial assessment of associate editor.
Journal of Pain 6.1
weeks
11.0
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted