Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.6 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
0
1
Rejected
2021
Motivation: One of the reviewers was a competitor and with the irrelevant to the article comments he strongly recommended reject. The editor should have sent the article to a third reviewer and should have understand that the review is biased based. The other review was really low quality. Nothing to the point.