Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.1 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
The process was straight forward. The manuscript was handled in a professional manner. One of the reviewers was certainly though, but fair, and the manuscript improve in quality through the comments. The preprints looked beautiful; pretty good editorial work overall.
1.4 weeks
2.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
7.4 weeks
9.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The review process seemed fair and the reviewer comments were helpful, in general.
4.3 weeks
9.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
All the reviews were aimed at improving the quality of the manuscript.