Reviews for "Journal of Neural Engineering"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
6.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Reviewers suggested minor revisions that helped clarify the manuscript. Overall, a very good experience.
7.6 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
10.3 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: The reviews were good. There were only some editorial suggestions.
8.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
1
1
Rejected
2017
Motivation: The review reports were not strong to reject the paper. These review reports were not even useful for improving the paper.
13.0 weeks
21.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2014
7.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
2012
Motivation: The Editor rejected the paper, although the Reviewer's comments seemed quite positive to me. I could not really understand the Editor's decision.