Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.3 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The review process was smooth and the reviewers helped me improve the paper. However, I found one of the reviewers repeatedly requesting for additions to the reference list with each reference belonging to a single author. I believe the editor should check such reviewers and push back against this.