Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.0 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The Editor's as well as the Reviewer's comments were very helpful and constructive-minded, they helped to further improve the quality of the paper. In my opinion, the first review round took relatively long, but after that, everything went fine and quickly.