Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: The journal indicates that it is interested in Molluscan physiological papers, but the reasons given for manuscript rejection suggest that the focus is behavioral and ecology. This manuscript was rejected due to the lack of “relevance to field conditions” and “behavior in the field.” Although, I enjoy reading this journal, I would caution physiologist about submitting their manuscripts. On the other hand, behavioral scientist and ecologist would likely benefit from the very fast response times.
21.7 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2012
Motivation: Reviewers were anonymous but clearly competent. The editor was particularly attentive to organization of the MS, compliance to journal style and language rules, and related details. Total processing time from submission to publication was less than one year, which I regard as excellent.