Reviews for "Journal of Materials Science"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Materials Science n/a n/a 27.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: It took the Editorial Office four weeks to come up with this statement:
"We have considered your manuscript for publication in JMSC and regrettably conclude that this manuscript is not suited for publication in this journal.
Please note that this does not pass judgment on the technical aspects of your research. The decision is solely based on the contributions of the manuscript as the findings do not indicate significant new advances in the understanding of materials science that justify publication in JMSC." The member of the Editorial Office, who checked our manuscript, had H-index of 13.
Journal of Materials Science 4.3
weeks
8.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 9.0
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 6.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected
Journal of Materials Science 7.7
weeks
13.1
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process itself was satisfactory. The only weak point was the quality of the reviewers' reports. I understand, however, that choosing the right reviewer for a given work can be a difficult task.
Journal of Materials Science 3.0
weeks
5.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 7.0
weeks
7.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted