Reviews for "Journal of Materials Science"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Materials Science 4.3
weeks
8.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 9.0
weeks
9.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 6.0
weeks
6.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected
Journal of Materials Science 7.7
weeks
13.1
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process itself was satisfactory. The only weak point was the quality of the reviewers' reports. I understand, however, that choosing the right reviewer for a given work can be a difficult task.
Journal of Materials Science 3.0
weeks
5.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Journal of Materials Science 7.0
weeks
7.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted