Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
n/a
n/a
27 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
It took the Editorial Office four weeks to come up with this statement:
"We have considered your manuscript for publication in JMSC and regrettably conclude that this manuscript is not suited for publication in this journal.
Please note that this does not pass judgment on the technical aspects of your research. The decision is solely based on the contributions of the manuscript as the findings do not indicate significant new advances in the understanding of materials science that justify publication in JMSC." The member of the Editorial Office, who checked our manuscript, had H-index of 13.
"We have considered your manuscript for publication in JMSC and regrettably conclude that this manuscript is not suited for publication in this journal.
Please note that this does not pass judgment on the technical aspects of your research. The decision is solely based on the contributions of the manuscript as the findings do not indicate significant new advances in the understanding of materials science that justify publication in JMSC." The member of the Editorial Office, who checked our manuscript, had H-index of 13.
4.3 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
9.0 weeks
9.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
6.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
7.7 weeks
13.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
The review process itself was satisfactory. The only weak point was the quality of the reviewers' reports. I understand, however, that choosing the right reviewer for a given work can be a difficult task.
3.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
7.0 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted