Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.4 weeks
4.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
2
Rejected
2020
Motivation: One of the review reports was written in poor English and had a lot of linguistic mistakes. The reviewer only commented on the merits of the paper, which did not fit in his opinion with the journal. I only blame the editorial board for sending it out to reviewers despite them arguing the paper was out of the journal's scope.