Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.9 weeks
7.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2020
8.7 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
Review process was fairly quick and the reviews were excellent quality.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
The manuscript sat with the editor for two months before being sent out for review. Once it was sent out to reviewers the decision was made within a month. Admittedly this was during the COVID pandemic but it was fair longer than the other manuscripts I had sent to other journals at that same time period.
9.1 weeks
21.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2020
11.1 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
Interesting and useful feedback from the reviewers as well as the editor
13.1 weeks
18.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
8.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
10.4 weeks
21.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Received 3 very helpful reviews in the first round, after major revisions finally accepted without further ado. Overall process was very fast and the editor was very professional. One of the best review experiences yet.
12.0 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015
14.4 weeks
14.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2014