Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
11.9 weeks
37.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Reviewers sometimes has contradicting advice, editor handled that well. Editor gave good input for what to focus on and was very precise. Also very quick in replies, delays were due to authors' lack of time. Sometimes editor was a bit too much involved, because editor also went as far to use track changes to change certain wording in the paper (e.g. changing argue into contend)