Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.4 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2014
Motivation: The reviewing process is fast but the reviews look like the reviewers were not really into the topic of the paper. Most of the comments of the reviewers were meaningless.