Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.9 weeks
14.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
2
Rejected
2026
Motivation: The manuscript spent almost three months under editorial assessment before being sent for peer review, making the overall process unusually slow. Although rejection after review is a normal editorial outcome, the lengthy initial editorial stage significantly increased the time before a decision was reached.
12.3 weeks
27.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2023
Motivation: Typical experience, with longer gaps in between; we were surprised that the editor wanted to check the minor revisions at the end with the reviewers, but we're through.