Reviews for "Journal of Hydrology"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
6.5 weeks	10.5 weeks	n/a	2	3 (good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2015
18.1 weeks	18.1 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Rejected	2015
n/a	n/a	6.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2015
Motivation: The editor suggested to transfer the article to the Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies.
34.7 weeks	34.7 weeks	n/a	3	3 (good)	2 (moderate)	Rejected	2014
Motivation: Very inefficient editorial handling. It took over 4 months for the Editor to realise that one of the reviewers had not provided the review and another 2 months for them to find another reviewer. Never replied to emails.
30.4 weeks	33.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2011
104.2 weeks	117.2 weeks	n/a	1	5 (excellent)	1 (bad)	Accepted	2013