Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.4 weeks
13.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2023
Motivation:
The two reviews comprised of one extensive report (and very useful in helping improve the manuscript further) and one paragraph of bullet points that were barely legible. The editor sided with the latter and recommended transfer to JoH-Regional Studies. The assistant editor's summary did not line up with what was written in the reviews, to the point that their two sentences seem boilerplate.
11.9 weeks
26.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
The review process was a bit slow however the reviews were professional and constructive. The reviewer's comments and suggestions helped to improve the original submission. The handling editor was also responsive and helpful.
6.5 weeks
10.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
18.1 weeks
18.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
The editor suggested to transfer the article to the Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies.
34.7 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
Very inefficient editorial handling. It took over 4 months for the Editor to realise that one of the reviewers had not provided the review and another 2 months for them to find another reviewer. Never replied to emails.
30.4 weeks
33.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2011
104.2 weeks
117.2 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2013