Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.9 weeks
26.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
The review process was a bit slow however the reviews were professional and constructive. The reviewer's comments and suggestions helped to improve the original submission. The handling editor was also responsive and helpful.
6.5 weeks
10.5 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
18.1 weeks
18.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015
n/a
n/a
6 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
The editor suggested to transfer the article to the Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies.
34.7 weeks
34.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
Very inefficient editorial handling. It took over 4 months for the Editor to realise that one of the reviewers had not provided the review and another 2 months for them to find another reviewer. Never replied to emails.
30.4 weeks
33.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2011
104.2 weeks
117.2 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2013