Reviews for "Journal of Hydrology"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
6.5
weeks
10.5
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015
18.1
weeks
18.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2015
n/a n/a 6.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Motivation: The editor suggested to transfer the article to the Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies.
34.7
weeks
34.7
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: Very inefficient editorial handling. It took over 4 months for the Editor to realise that one of the reviewers had not provided the review and another 2 months for them to find another reviewer. Never replied to emails.
30.4
weeks
33.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2011
104.2
weeks
117.2
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
1
(bad)
Accepted 2013