Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: The process took extremely long (for a Discussion article), and I did not receive review reports so I am not sure whether it has been reviewed apart from the editors. Finally, the Closure that belonged to this Discussion did not match (e.g. referring to non-existing figures), so it seems the editors did not check and read carefully.
Motivation: Review process took a long time. Reviewer suggested rejection because of matters that was not the focus of the paper and were not even major.
Motivation: Took a long time. The reviewer advised rejection while it was possible to address their comments.