Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.9 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
My only complaint about this journal is the slow review process. Other than that, I feel that the editor and reviewers are very fair and great to work with.
7.9 weeks
36.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The comments and reviews provided were generally of good quality. My only major issue is with the number of revisions required: two rounds with reviewers (not a problem) and then revisions from three different editors, each requiring resubmission. Staff at Allen Press were really great working with proofs.