Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.1 weeks
4.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2019
Motivation: The review process was rapid and a statistical review also was done. Although we felt the editors were harsh in rejecting as the reviews were ambivalent
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation: Experience was positive. Editorial board was professional. After rejection, we submitted the manuscript to another journal