Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
114 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
Gap between submission and editorial decision is too long with nearly 4 months.
12.6 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
Minor corrections to the typesetting of equations took over one month for the publishers to correct. Response to questions about article status very slow. The stated expected turnaround of 4 months for peer review seems overly long - I received a request from the same journal to review an article within 3 weeks.
4.3 weeks
4.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
It was fast and smooth process.
13.1 weeks
13.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
average quality of review