Reviews for "Journal of Hazardous Materials"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Journal of Hazardous Materials | n/a | n/a | 114.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Gap between submission and editorial decision is too long with nearly 4 months. | |||||||
Journal of Hazardous Materials | 12.6 weeks |
12.7 weeks |
n/a | 0 | n/a | 3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Minor corrections to the typesetting of equations took over one month for the publishers to correct. Response to questions about article status very slow. The stated expected turnaround of 4 months for peer review seems overly long - I received a request from the same journal to review an article within 3 weeks. | |||||||
Journal of Hazardous Materials | 4.3 weeks |
4.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: It was fast and smooth process. | |||||||
Journal of Hazardous Materials | 13.1 weeks |
13.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: average quality of review |