Reviews for "Journal of Hazardous Materials"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Hazardous Materials n/a n/a 114.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Gap between submission and editorial decision is too long with nearly 4 months.
Journal of Hazardous Materials 12.6
weeks
12.7
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: Minor corrections to the typesetting of equations took over one month for the publishers to correct. Response to questions about article status very slow. The stated expected turnaround of 4 months for peer review seems overly long - I received a request from the same journal to review an article within 3 weeks.
Journal of Hazardous Materials 4.3
weeks
4.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: It was fast and smooth process.
Journal of Hazardous Materials 13.1
weeks
13.1
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: average quality of review