Follow @scirev on Twitter
Reviews for "Journal of Happiness Studies"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Journal of Happiness Studies | 15.1 weeks |
52.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: It took one complete year. The communication with the editor was always fluid. However, the paper went through four unnecessary rounds and the editor just made comments at the end (did she read it before?). The review could be improved if the editor takes a more active role as a referee and provide feedback earlier in the process. | |||||||
| Journal of Happiness Studies | 13.0 weeks |
21.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Journal of Happiness Studies | 24.0 weeks |
56.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: It was a long process, but overall the feedback was positive and improved the quality of the document. | |||||||
| Journal of Happiness Studies | 17.0 weeks |
17.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 0 (very bad) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: After more than 4 months I received about 8 lines of comments from each of reviewers. | |||||||
| Journal of Happiness Studies | 77.3 weeks |
97.9 weeks |
n/a | 5 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Journal of Happiness Studies | 26.0 weeks |
26.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |