Reviews for "Journal of Happiness Studies"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Happiness Studies 15.1
weeks
52.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: It took one complete year. The communication with the editor was always fluid. However, the paper went through four unnecessary rounds and the editor just made comments at the end (did she read it before?). The review could be improved if the editor takes a more active role as a referee and provide feedback earlier in the process.
Journal of Happiness Studies 13.0
weeks
21.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Happiness Studies 24.0
weeks
56.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: It was a long process, but overall the feedback was positive and improved the quality of the document.
Journal of Happiness Studies 17.0
weeks
17.0
weeks
n/a 2 0
(very bad)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: After more than 4 months I received about 8 lines of comments from each of reviewers.
Journal of Happiness Studies 77.3
weeks
97.9
weeks
n/a 5 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Journal of Happiness Studies 26.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected