Reviews for "Journal of Geometry and Physics"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
57.9 weeks	58.6 weeks	n/a	1	3 (good)	3 (good)	Accepted	2016
Motivation: The process was extremely slow but the report was quite accurate
57.9 weeks	65.9 weeks	n/a	1	3 (good)	2 (moderate)	Accepted	2016
Motivation: The comments were all reasonable but the process has been extremely slow
10.1 weeks	10.1 weeks	n/a	0	n/a	4 (very good)	Accepted	2016
Motivation: We sent the paper to the editor for the special issue, Prof. Eva Miranda, and has been fast and serious in the whole process
8.7 weeks	19.5 weeks	n/a	1	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2014
23.9 weeks	32.4 weeks	n/a	1	5 (excellent)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2015
Motivation: Very good reviewer, the editor was a little bit slow in dealing with paper