Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
57.9 weeks
58.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
3
Accepted
2016
Motivation: The process was extremely slow but the report was quite accurate
57.9 weeks
65.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3
2
Accepted
2016
Motivation: The comments were all reasonable but the process has been extremely slow
10.1 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: We sent the paper to the editor for the special issue, Prof. Eva Miranda, and has been fast and serious in the whole process
8.7 weeks
19.5 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
23.9 weeks
32.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Very good reviewer, the editor was a little bit slow in dealing with paper