Reviews for "Journal of Geometry and Physics"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
57.9
weeks
58.6
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The process was extremely slow but the report was quite accurate
57.9
weeks
65.9
weeks
n/a 1 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The comments were all reasonable but the process has been extremely slow
10.1
weeks
10.1
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: We sent the paper to the editor for the special issue, Prof. Eva Miranda, and has been fast and serious in the whole process
8.7
weeks
19.5
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2014
23.9
weeks
32.4
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015
Motivation: Very good reviewer, the editor was a little bit slow in dealing with paper