Reviews for "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
11.6
weeks
11.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: Overall, I was happy with the whole process. The only downside was that one of the reviewers clearly did not read the manuscript properly, but simply wrote a few lines with general questions (which were all answered in the manuscript upon closer reading). The other 2 reviewers' comments were useful however, and the editor also read the manuscript, so it was compensated for.
7.6
weeks
7.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2015
11.4
weeks
14.4
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2014
8.0
weeks
18.4
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: The reviews we received were very good. I was slightly disappointed that the article was sent out a second time as it did not require any major revisions (such as additional data collection). I felt the editor could have made an assessment from our revision based on the first set of reviews. The second review process added 67 days, making the total time under review about 6 months.