Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
6.6 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
2
Rejected
2014
Motivation: Our manuscript was rejected due to "some important problems" identified by reviewers. The editor sent the review reports, but one of them just referred to the attached PDF with comments. This, allegedly, contained information about the important problems, but was not forwarded to us. We sent a request to recieve this attachment to the editor, but never heard back from him.
5.6 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
0
Rejected
2014
Motivation: Very poor process. Only one review from a reviewer with overly narrow focus. Did not give fair evaluation of overall merit. Editor did not get alternate reviews or supplement with own evaluation.