Reviews for "Journal of Experimental Biology"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Journal of Experimental Biology | 2.0 weeks |
4.2 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: This was my first experience with this journal and I was totally impressed with the rapid responses and reasonable concerns. | |||||||
| Journal of Experimental Biology | 8.7 weeks |
12.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The editor took an active role in the review, clearly carefully reading both the reviewer comments and our responses. The reviewers were constructive in their comments, and willing to accept arguments made about how or why things were done as they were. Finally, the submission process is very straightforward: only a simple PDF, with minimal formatting, is needed. All major formatting is done after acceptance, which would save a lot of time if the paper is eventually rejected. | |||||||
@scirev