Reviews for "Journal of Experimental Biology"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Experimental Biology 4.0
weeks		 7.3
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The most useful, efficient, and even pleasurable, review and publication process I have been involved in so far. Really impressed by this journal and look forward to submitting to JEB in the future. I especially want to highlight that the post acceptance publishing/ proofing editors were very friendly, quick and meticulous. I am very impressed by the whole experience.
Journal of Experimental Biology 2.0
weeks		 4.2
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: This was my first experience with this journal and I was totally impressed with the rapid responses and reasonable concerns.
Journal of Experimental Biology 8.7
weeks		 12.7
weeks		 n/a 2 3
(good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The editor took an active role in the review, clearly carefully reading both the reviewer comments and our responses. The reviewers were constructive in their comments, and willing to accept arguments made about how or why things were done as they were. Finally, the submission process is very straightforward: only a simple PDF, with minimal formatting, is needed. All major formatting is done after acceptance, which would save a lot of time if the paper is eventually rejected.