Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
The most useful, efficient, and even pleasurable, review and publication process I have been involved in so far. Really impressed by this journal and look forward to submitting to JEB in the future. I especially want to highlight that the post acceptance publishing/ proofing editors were very friendly, quick and meticulous. I am very impressed by the whole experience.
2.0 weeks
4.2 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
This was my first experience with this journal and I was totally impressed with the rapid responses and reasonable concerns.
8.7 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The editor took an active role in the review, clearly carefully reading both the reviewer comments and our responses. The reviewers were constructive in their comments, and willing to accept arguments made about how or why things were done as they were. Finally, the submission process is very straightforward: only a simple PDF, with minimal formatting, is needed. All major formatting is done after acceptance, which would save a lot of time if the paper is eventually rejected.