Reviews for "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Immediately accepted after 0.3 weeks Accepted (im.)
Motivation: This was an overall very positive and encouraging publishing experience for our work to be accepted immediately without peer review by the Chief Editor who is a well-known figure for his high-quality, objective and meticulous reviews and feedback.
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 24.0
weeks
24.1
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The technical editor did a great job in replying to all of our comments and queries.
From the two peer reviewers, only one of them provided comments and suggestions that required structural and valid changes to the manuscript. The second reviewers praised and encouraged the work without any recommendations for modifications or change. The Editor-in-chief also responds to any query or concern if requested to.
The overall experience of publishing this manuscript with the assistance of the editorial board of the JECP, was an inspiring, learning and pleasant one!
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4.9
weeks
4.9
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The comments received from the editor and the two reviewers were very objective, systematic, constructive and even inspiring. They included some editing in the wording. Also, they helped us clarify and re-write some ambiguous points and redesign tables. For few of the comments that we felt inappropriate, we sent back explanations and justifications to support our views. These justifications were accepted. Our authorship group considered this experiences indeed a rich and inspiring one!