Reviews for "Journal of European Public Policy"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2020
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation: They had far too many submissions for the special issue we targeted, clearly explained.
7.6 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2017
Motivation: It was an outstanding review process with JEPP. The editors are very active, serious, and encouraging. Good reviewer selection, speedy process, no delays.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation: paper was too descriptive for the journal, suggested two alternative journals to try
8.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Rejected
2015
4.3 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2012
Motivation: I have received very useful reviews in a short time. The online prepublication version of my article was published in less than 6 months following initial submission. Moreover, the Editors are open to suggestions and do not follow 'slavishly' reviewers' comments.