Reviews for "Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 17.4
weeks
66.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: I was strongly encouraged to rewrite the original submitted version. I did so, also submitting a detailed list of changes and responses. I submitted the revised version in September 2015. Toward the end of January 2015, I wrote the editor seeking an update. The reply: "I am still waiting for the reviews but chasing the reviewers. Hope to be able to come back to you shortly".

Having no reply, I wrote the editor in early September 2016, asking for an update. The reply in part: "To be frank, we have discussed your paper among the guest editors but felt that on balance the revised version did not address the concerns that had been raised by the reviewers. Hence we were not very optimistic that the revised paper would survive the inevitable peer review."
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning n/a n/a 1.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The Editor suggested, in a relevant way, a different kind of journal.
Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 8.7
weeks
8.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Rejected
Motivation: Good reports, quick handling.