Reviews for "Journal of Engineering and Technology Management"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
n/a	n/a	11.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2021
Motivation: Desk rejection for being out of scope. However, the journal’s webpage and the Elsevier journal finder suggested otherwise.
32.9 weeks	34.9 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	3 (good)	Accepted	2021
Motivation: After the first round, the article had a status of completion of the review for 3 months. We contacted the journal manager twice. Then we wrote to the editor-in-chief and received the article for revision in 1 hour.
30.3 weeks	46.6 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Accepted	2017
Motivation: The process was quite slow. The first review round took over half a year which is way too long. The editor had a good touch and the reviewers were knowledgeable.