Reviews for "Journal of Empirical Finance"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Empirical Finance n/a n/a 8.0
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: We literally have paid for nothing by submitting to the Journal of Empirical Finance. I have the impression that the editor in charge of my paper has not even read it, as there was just a copy-pasted message suggesting that our paper was not fit for the readership of the journal. I am aware that high desk rejection rates are common in top journals, but what bothers are two issues: 1) not any feedback at all and 2) not even recommending for the article transfer service (ATS), which connecting 1 and 2, passes the impression of our work not being read at all. After paying high submission fees, a minor feedback would be expected if the work was minimaly evaluated.
Journal of Empirical Finance 24.4
n/a 1 1
Motivation: Against a fee payment, after 6 months just one report, which was not constructive (just providing a very generic disagreement on the approach adopted).