Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.3 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
Everything was clear, from the editor instructions to the referee comments.
3.0 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The review process should be fair and transparent. And the reviewer should give his/her best time to judge the work properly with some positive comments if the research is in positive direction instead of rejection.