Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.1 weeks
8.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
It took a while, but the reviewer reports were painfully accurate in identifying weaknesses with the paper.
13.7 weeks
13.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
The editor's email was rudely phrased, especially since I was suggested by an editor to send it to this journal and the the reviews suggest the reviewers voted R&R. While not everything in the reviews was clear and some of it is impossible (ie creating new data), some helpful comments can be extracted. The time and the editor's attitude have put me off this journal though.
9.0 weeks
9.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
The points adressed by the reviewers could have easily been resolved. We believe the journal declined as one reviewer was not sure about the "fit" of our manuscript with the journal.