Reviews for "Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52.1
weeks
52.1
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 0
(very bad)
Rejected 2021
Motivation: After one year without any response I had to withdraw my manuscript, the support kept giving me the same answers and the editor was not responding.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization n/a n/a 23.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 9.6
weeks
9.6
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: The process was reasonably fast and quite transparent. The reviewer's report was short but reasonable and well argumented.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 35.7
weeks
35.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2019
Motivation: Too long process
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12.7
weeks
20.4
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2018
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25.0
weeks
51.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 65.1
weeks
65.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2014
Motivation: It simply took too long time.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17.7
weeks
34.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2015
Motivation: The review reports were of high quality and helpful for strenghtening the paper.
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2015
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization n/a n/a 18.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2014
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 30.4
weeks
30.4
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2011
Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17.4
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: The editor clearly wants a speedy process, and thanked the authors for resubmitting quickly.