Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
52.1 weeks
52.1 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
0
Rejected
2021
Motivation: After one year without any response I had to withdraw my manuscript, the support kept giving me the same answers and the editor was not responding.
n/a
n/a
23 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
9.6 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
5
Rejected
2018
Motivation: The process was reasonably fast and quite transparent. The reviewer's report was short but reasonable and well argumented.
35.7 weeks
35.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
0
Rejected
2019
Motivation: Too long process
12.7 weeks
20.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
4
Accepted
2018
25.0 weeks
51.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
65.1 weeks
65.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
2
Rejected
2014
Motivation: It simply took too long time.
17.7 weeks
34.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The review reports were of high quality and helpful for strenghtening the paper.
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
n/a
n/a
18 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
30.4 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Rejected
2011
17.4 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2013
Motivation: The editor clearly wants a speedy process, and thanked the authors for resubmitting quickly.