Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
The evaluation by the handling editor was detailed, so, even though the outcome was a rejection, the overall satisfaction with the journal was positive.
18.7 weeks
35.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
Motivation:
A long waiting and many changes were made to the manuscript. Unfortunately it wasn't enough for publication. It was frustrating to receive a rejection after 3 reviews.
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
It took a long time for them to even decide if they would send it out for review, but once they sent it out, the entire process moved very quickly and smoothly.
10.6 weeks
19.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
n/a
n/a
15 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
6.1 weeks
7.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
9.0 weeks
19.9 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
the handling time was fair, the review report was a high quality with many excelent suggestions
n/a
n/a
9 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
The immediate rejection was unfair because the editor has not understood the submission because of a sloppy assessment. I replied but the editor refused to admit his mistake.
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation:
Associate editor had read the manuscript and the persons name was given in the decision.