Reviews for "Journal of Differential Equations"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Journal of Differential Equations 34.7
weeks
36.7
weeks
n/a 1 1
(bad)
3
(good)
Accepted
Journal of Differential Equations 8.4
weeks
12.7
weeks
n/a 1 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The report I received was very timely, critical, to the point and clear. The comments made by the reviewer improved considerably my paper. Moreover, from the comments, suggestions and criticisms, it was very clear that the reviewer is an expert in the field. I am extremely satisfied with the whole process, in particular with the way the editor Adrian Constantin handled my paper. In a nutshell, it was an excellent experience.
Journal of Differential Equations n/a n/a 15.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: I received the following comments from the editor-in-chief: "The topic and the methods are by now relatively standard, so that the innovative part is not up to the expected level.
While the paper deserves to be published, I would say, the proper forum is some journal devoted to mathematical physics."
Journal of Differential Equations 7.9
weeks
7.9
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The referee said "The subject is of interest and the material is worth publishing in a journal of a good standing. However, JDE is not appropriate: the main strength of the paper is not in the direction of technical of conceptual analytic innovations, but more in the direction of physical modelling."
The main problem with this report is that the paper contains both technical and conceptual analytic innovations in the field of differential equations. Based on the referee opinion the paper was rejected.