Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
3.1 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
The handling process was smooth. There was a conflict between our opinion and reviewers opinion. So editor send our manuscript to the another reviewer. And finally our manuscript have been accepted. I recommend this journal
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
Reviewer suggested not to publish our manuscript in the journal. He gave some fair comment. Overall good experience
7.1 weeks
23.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2014
25.1 weeks
27.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2011
Motivation:
Many of the reviewers' comments were not significant.
5.1 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
0 reports
n/a
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The manuscript was reviewed in a very short period of time.
5.0 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Everything was OK, I can recommend this journal.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
Editors message - "Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that the Reviewer #1 is advising against publication of your work, suggesting that this paper might be better suited for a control journal. Therefore I must reject it."
With decision based on the reviewer 1 who also writes "Overall, the authors present an interesting approach." and reviewer 2 who writes "This paper is an important contribution to this area of research." Obviously the Editor generates decision on the 1st reviewer whose claims are not supported since similar works have been published in Journal of Crystal Growth. Not only that Editor does not give any chance to authors to refute reviewer's claims.
With decision based on the reviewer 1 who also writes "Overall, the authors present an interesting approach." and reviewer 2 who writes "This paper is an important contribution to this area of research." Obviously the Editor generates decision on the 1st reviewer whose claims are not supported since similar works have been published in Journal of Crystal Growth. Not only that Editor does not give any chance to authors to refute reviewer's claims.