Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.7 weeks
14.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The comments of the reviewers are very instructive and interesting
The only weak point is the waiting time which is long
The only weak point is the waiting time which is long
12.7 weeks
27.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
I am extremely satisfied by the way the manuscript has been handled by the editorial board.
15.4 weeks
49.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
Terrible journal - editors will keep saying they are interested in your manuscript but taking way too long to handle them, and request major edits. Too much effort for a 1.3 impact factor journal.
15.1 weeks
28.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
As one of the authors of the manuscript, I feel that the reviewers and the editor did not understand the core of our propositions with this article. I nevertheless appreciate their comments and suggestions and will always seek to publish with this journal again.
23.3 weeks
31.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
21.0 weeks
46.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
17.4 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015