Reviews for "Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
14.7
weeks
14.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2021
Motivation: The comments of the reviewers are very instructive and interesting
The only weak point is the waiting time which is long
12.7
weeks
27.7
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: I am extremely satisfied by the way the manuscript has been handled by the editorial board.
15.4
weeks
49.2
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: Terrible journal - editors will keep saying they are interested in your manuscript but taking way too long to handle them, and request major edits. Too much effort for a 1.3 impact factor journal.
15.1
weeks
28.7
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: As one of the authors of the manuscript, I feel that the reviewers and the editor did not understand the core of our propositions with this article. I nevertheless appreciate their comments and suggestions and will always seek to publish with this journal again.
23.3
weeks
31.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2017
21.0
weeks
46.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
17.4
weeks
30.4
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2013
13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2015