Reviews for "Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology"

Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
14.7 weeks	14.7 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Rejected	2021
Motivation: The comments of the reviewers are very instructive and interesting The only weak point is the waiting time which is long
12.7 weeks	27.7 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2018
Motivation: I am extremely satisfied by the way the manuscript has been handled by the editorial board.
15.4 weeks	49.2 weeks	n/a	2	2 (moderate)	0 (very bad)	Rejected	2018
Motivation: Terrible journal - editors will keep saying they are interested in your manuscript but taking way too long to handle them, and request major edits. Too much effort for a 1.3 impact factor journal.
15.1 weeks	28.7 weeks	n/a	3	3 (good)	3 (good)	Rejected	2018
Motivation: As one of the authors of the manuscript, I feel that the reviewers and the editor did not understand the core of our propositions with this article. I nevertheless appreciate their comments and suggestions and will always seek to publish with this journal again.
23.3 weeks	31.4 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Accepted	2017
21.0 weeks	46.9 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2016
17.4 weeks	30.4 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	2 (moderate)	Accepted	2013
13.0 weeks	13.0 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Rejected	2015